謙聖國際法律事務所

Can two companies use the same printer or account to prepare government procurement bids in Taiwan? A 2025 Ciaotou District Court acquittal explains why shared office equipment and tender document downloads do not automatically prove criminal bid rigging. This article examines Article 87 of Taiwan's Government Procurement Act, the distinction between administrative irregularities and criminal fraud, the burden of proof, and practical strategies for businesses facing procurement investigations. The case is independently analyzed and was not handled by Chien Sheng International Law Firm.

政府採購標案遭控圍標、陪標或搓圓仔湯，企業負責人一定有罪嗎？本文解析《政府採購法》第87條詐術圍標、合意圍標與借牌投標的差異，整理檢調常見蒐證方式、無罪辯護重點，以及押標金追繳與停權風險。

轉發地震假消息，竟可能觸犯《災害防救法》第53條？分享不實訊息不代表一定有罪，仍須判斷犯罪故意與損害危險。本文解析LINE、社群轉貼的法律責任，以及收到警察通知後的蒐證與辯護重點。

前男友指控販毒，還拿出1萬1千元匯款紀錄與監視器畫面，為什麼法院最後判無罪？本案關鍵在於證人翻供、感情報復動機，以及匯款可能屬於喪葬奠儀。本文解析販毒案件的證據認定、誣告責任與刑事辯護重點。

機關拜託廠商幫忙「湊三家」，竟被檢察官指控詐術圍標？政府採購陪標不一定成立犯罪！本文解析橋頭地院無罪判決、政府採購法第87條構成要件、投標文件異常與假性競爭爭議，帶您了解企業參與政府標案的法律界線。

家族企業同時參與政府採購標案，就一定構成圍標嗎？臺北地院一件無罪判決指出，不能只憑親屬關係、相同營業地址或共同準備文件，就直接認定犯罪。本文解析詐術圍標罪、廠商資格爭議與企業投標自保重點。

Why must Taiwan release some foreign nationals even when their deportation remains incomplete? Immigration detention is subject to statutory limits and constitutional protections. This guide explains the 100-day detention framework, separate rules for Mainland Chinese residents, common deportation delays, humanitarian safeguards, and alternatives to detention under Taiwanese law.

政府採購圍標、借牌投標、陪標會被判刑嗎？同業合作、相同IP投標或工程圖說外流，是否就代表犯罪？本文解析政府採購法第87條、第89條及常見違法態樣，說明行政異常與刑事責任的界線，以及企業面臨檢調調查時的法律辯護方向。

Can attending a dinner and withdrawing from a government tender lead to a bid-rigging conviction? A Taiwan High Court ruling overturned a contractor's conviction after evidence showed that threats and intimidation, rather than voluntary collusion, caused the withdrawal. Learn how Article 87 of the Government Procurement Act applies and why criminal intent and reliable evidence are essential to a bid-rigging prosecution.

政府工程尚未公告招標，設計公司提供圖說給同業就構成洩密罪嗎？高雄地院一件無罪判決指出，交付光碟不等於交付採購機密，仍須證明資料內容具有應秘密性。本文解析未扣案物證、證人證詞、通訊監察譯文與刑事證據不足的法律關鍵。